Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the more expensive Core i5-6500TE on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1088 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-6500TE.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-6500TE - 183 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-6500TE - $197.65 vs $489.95
- Up to 60% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-6500TE - $1.08 vs $2.71 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500TE - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500TE
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
183
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Buy for $489.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 11th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i5-6500TE |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 11th, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |