Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2824 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-2500K - 115 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $197.65 vs $449.95
- Up to 58% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-2500K - $1.72 vs $4.05 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
115
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$197.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $197.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Buy for $449.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |