Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1929 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 10% better in World of Warcraft than Core i7-3770K - 178 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 21% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $175.0 vs $221.76
- Up to 14% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.08 vs $1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
86%
Price, $
$221.76
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7686 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
162
91%
Value, $/FPS
$1.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$175
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7685 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |