Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $175.0 vs $258.99
- Up to 18% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-11700F - $1.11 vs $1.35 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 22% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770K - 192 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 16 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
157
81%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$175
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
82%
Price, $
$258.99
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $258.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |