Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400 is 435 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 294 vs 291 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $160.91 vs $221.76
- Up to 28% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.55 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
291
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
72%
Price, $
$221.76
72%
Buy for $221.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
294
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$160.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |