Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 559 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $133.93 vs $224.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-10700F - $0.49 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Core i5-9400 - 279 vs 275 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 16 vs 6 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
275
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$133.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $133.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 741 minutes ago
Buy for $224 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 742 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |