Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900HS is 982 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Performs up to 8% better in Sea of Thieves than EPYC 7551P - 237 vs 219 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS - 64 vs 16 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | EPYC |
| Renoir | Codename | Naples |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 32 |
| 16 | Threads | 64 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
