Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900HS is 2007 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Performs up to 8% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 114 vs 106 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS - 24 vs 16 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Renoir | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
