Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Core i7-5650U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900HS is 1833 days newer than Core i7-5650U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-5650U - 132 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5650U - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5650U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS - 15 vs 35 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Core i7-5650U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Core i7-5650U |
|---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Renoir | Codename | Broadwell |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel BGA 1168 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | 15 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 6000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
