Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 252 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 7% better in Rust than Core i3-10105F - 210 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 71% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $84.98 vs $295.0
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
Buy for $84.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1454
84.09485251590515%
Multi-Core
4472
44.586241276171485%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |