Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 68 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 1% better in Saints Row than Core i9-10900F - 167 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $222.99 vs $295.0
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Buy for $222.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
96.93464430306535%
Multi-Core
8426
84.00797607178465%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |