Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 945 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - $83.24 vs $389.98
- Up to 75% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-14700K - $0.63 vs $2.48 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 19% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10105F - 157 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 28 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$83.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $83.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
157
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.48/FPS
25%
Price, $
$389.98
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |