Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1750 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-6950X - 168 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $98.18 vs $499.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-6950X - $0.58 vs $3.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 20 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $98.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Buy for $499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-6950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |