Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $98.18 vs $471.87
- Up to 74% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.53 vs $2.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 65 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 28% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-10105F - 236 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
184
77%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Buy for $471.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |