Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700 is 315 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-12700 - $82.8 vs $265.48
- Up to 67% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-12700 - $0.4 vs $1.21 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-10105F - 219 vs 205 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
219
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
33%
Price, $
$265.48
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-12700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |