Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 798 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $98.18 vs $286.74
- Up to 65% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-9900KF - $0.56 vs $1.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-10105F - 180 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
175
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.59/FPS
35%
Price, $
$286.74
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $286.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |