Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 232 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $98.18 vs $279.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-10850K - $0.62 vs $1.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-10105F - 161 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
159
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
Buy for $279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |