Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $98.18 vs $249.98
- Up to 55% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-13600KF - $0.74 vs $1.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 16% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10105F - 153 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 20 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
86%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
45%
Price, $
$249.98
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $249.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |