Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G is 3520 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
- Performs up to 19% better in No Man's Sky than FX-8150 - 186 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74783 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Cezanne | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |