Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U is 2565 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
- Performs up to 46% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-6350 - 350 vs 240 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • May 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
May 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Renoir | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |