Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 932 days older than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 15 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 215 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 12 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
215
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $81.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |