Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 2613 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 28% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 143 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 5 5600X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2013 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Vermeer | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
