Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600HS outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600HS is 2443 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than FX-6350 - 150 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Renoir | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |