Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500U outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500U is 2078 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than FX-6350 - 252 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1982 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |