Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2300X outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2300X is 1960 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2300X
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than FX-6350 - 119 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2300X - 6 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $99.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |