Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 2307 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Phenom X4 9650 - 131 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 35 vs 95 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Agena | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
