Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 2356 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 11% better in New World than Phenom X4 9650 - 105 vs 95 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 85 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 16 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Agena | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
