Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 4255 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than Phenom X4 9650 - 333 vs 311 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Athlon |
| Agena | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
