Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 3340 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 4% better in New World than Phenom II X4 810 - 100 vs 96 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 54 vs 95 Watts
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
100
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$68.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
Deneb | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |