Buy on Amazon
$63.92
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2885 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Phenom II X4 810 - 191 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
191
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930 Dual-core (2 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Phenom II X4 810
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Deneb | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 13.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
