Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1336 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than FX-8320 - 170 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than FX-8320 - $59.4 vs $74.82
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $74.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74107 minutes ago
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |