Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690K outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4690K is 587 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Tanks than FX-8320 - 529 vs 504 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than FX-8320 - $56.0 vs $74.82
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 88 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $74.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74092 minutes ago
Buy for $56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74093 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 88 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |