Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1681 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $53.0 vs $101.79
- Up to 47% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-9400F - $0.31 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-4690K - 174 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 65 vs 88 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 6 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Buy for $101.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
88 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |