Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G3258 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G3258 is 587 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Performs up to 3% better in Ready or Not than FX-8300 - 240 vs 234 FPS
- Up to 56% cheaper than FX-8300 - $49.37 vs $112.02
- Up to 56% better value when playing Ready or Not than FX-8300 - $0.21 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 442 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
240
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $49.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 442 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Pentium |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |