Buy on Amazon
$112.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 555 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 64% better in Diablo IV than FX-8300 - 154 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than FX-8300 - $45.0 vs $112.02
- Up to 76% better value when playing Diablo IV than FX-8300 - $0.29 vs $1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition FX-8300 3.3 GHz with 4.2 GHz Turbo Octa core Processor (FD8300WMHKBOX)
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 616 minutes ago
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
154
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-4150 Processor (3M Cache, 3.50 GHz) BX80646I34150
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 617 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
