Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 57 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than FX-4130 - 44 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 51% cheaper than FX-8300 - $52.02 vs $106.06
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $106.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74759 minutes ago
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74758 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |