Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3438 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $22.92 vs $84.98
- Up to 70% better value when playing God of War than Core i3-12100F - $0.14 vs $0.46 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 15% better in God of War than FX-4130 - 186 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 58 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
186
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
30%
Price, $
$84.98
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $84.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |