Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2325 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $52.02 vs $85.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 132% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-4130 - 51 vs 22 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 6 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $52.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74092 minutes ago
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74093 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |