Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7350K outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7350K is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 19% better in World of Warcraft than FX-8300 - 184 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than FX-8300 - $51.6 vs $112.02
- Up to 61% better value when playing World of Warcraft than FX-8300 - $0.28 vs $0.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 756 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 756 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |