Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1738 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8300 - 181 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than FX-8300 - $65.23 vs $106.06
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $106.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74336 minutes ago
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74338 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Vishera | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |