Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3676 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $82.02 vs $298.85
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 81% better in Starfield than FX-8150 - 78 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75920 minutes ago
Buy for $298.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75920 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |