Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670S outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670S is 599 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-4670S - $39.99 vs $55.26
- Up to 19% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-4670S - $0.13 vs $0.16 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8120 - 340 vs 317 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16325 minutes ago
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16326 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8120 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
15.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |