Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7960X outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7960X is 1586 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-7960X - $100.0 vs $347.48
- Up to 68% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-7960X - $0.27 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-7960X - 125 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7960X
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield IV than FX-6350 - 413 vs 372 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 32 vs 6 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-7960X X-Series Processor 16 Cores up to 4.2 GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W
Buy for $347.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i9-7960X
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i9-7960X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Core i9 |
| Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 6 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
