Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3172 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $100.0 vs $432.99
- Up to 71% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-12900F - $0.85 vs $2.91 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 27% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-6350 - 149 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 24 vs 6 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.91/FPS
29%
Price, $
$432.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |