Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 1999 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - $100.0 vs $275.13
- Up to 61% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-9700K - $0.67 vs $1.71 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6350 - 161 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5869 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
39%
Price, $
$275.13
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for $275.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5870 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |