Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2961 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 11% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-6100 - 118 vs 106 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Athlon |
| Zambezi | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
