Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 1062 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 95 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 27% better in F1 23 than FX-6100 - 181 vs 142 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 20 vs 6 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |