Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 1062 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-6100 - 286 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 24 vs 6 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 6 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
