Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 2645 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 5% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-6100 - 160 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
