Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

FX-4100 vs Celeron G4900

FX-4100 vs Celeron G4900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2365 days newer than FX-4100.

Advantages of AMD FX-4100

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads

Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900

  • Performs up to 3% better in Sea of Thieves than FX-4100 - 210 vs 203 FPS
  • Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 54 vs 95 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Sea of Thieves.
Sea of Thieves

Sea of Thieves

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Mythical

AMD FX-4100 Logo
FX-4100

Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011


FPS

203

96.66666666666667%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018


FPS

210

100%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

$53.55

100%

FPS Winner

Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151

Buy for $53.55 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 75783 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Mythical

AMD FX-4100 Logo
FX-4100

Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD FX-4100 Logo
FX-4100

Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011


Single-Core

409

66.3961038961039%

Multi-Core

1028

97.8116079923882%

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018


Single-Core

616

100%

Multi-Core

1051

100%

AMD FX-4100 Logo

AMD FX-4100

vs
Intel Celeron G4900 Logo

Intel Celeron G4900

Oct 12th, 2011Release Date
Apr 3rd, 2018
FXCollectionCeleron
ZambeziCodenameCoffee Lake
AMD Socket AM3+SocketIntel Socket 1151
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4
Cores2
4
Threads2
3.6 GHz
Base Clock Speed3.1 GHz
3.7 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
95 WTDP
54 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
18.0xMultiplier
31.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 610
Yes
OverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.